Reviewer Guideline
The role of the reviewer is to help the author improve the quality of the manuscript through a careful, objective, and constructive assessment. The assessment is carried out on the manuscript in accordance with the reviewer's field of expertise, by paying attention to the advantages, parts that need to be improved, the relevance of the topic, and the elements of novelty and originality of the work. The reviewer is expected to convey clear and honest suggestions to the author.
Before accepting a review assignment, consider the following:
- Suitability of the field
of expertise Make sure the topic of the manuscript matches your competence. If the manuscript falls outside of the area of expertise, notify the editor immediately and, if possible, suggest another reviewer who is more appropriate. - Time availability
The review process is expected to be completed within four weeks. If you need additional time, let the editor know as soon as possible. You can also propose a replacement reviewer if you are unable to complete the assessment. - Potential conflicts of interest
Communicate to the editor any relationships or interests that may affect the objectivity of the assessment before beginning the review. If in doubt whether a situation constitutes a conflict of interest, contact the editorial office for direction.
