COMPARING CELLULOSE ISOLATION ROUTES FROM LIGNOCELLULOSIC AND AGRO-FOOD BIOMASS: A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF YIELD, PURITY AND CRYSTALLINITY

Authors

  • Agustu Sholeh Pujokaroni Master's Program in Food Technology and Agricultural Products, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia Author
  • Muhammad Safri Study Program of Agricultural Product Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia Author
  • Umi Martutik Study Program of Agricultural Product Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia Author
  • Mila Anindya Putri Dewanti Study Program of Agricultural Product Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Cellulose isolation, lignocellulosic biomass, agro-food waste, crystallinity index, deep eutectic solvents

Abstract

Cellulose from agricultural, food-processing and forest residues underpins microcrystalline cellulose, cellulose nanocrystals and other bio-based materials, but primary studies test different isolation routes on different feedstocks and report outcomes on non-equivalent bases. This structured review maps isolation routes for lignocellulosic and agro-food biomass in 57 studies published in 2018–2026 (50 from an author-compiled collection and 7 from targeted searches) and compares them on cellulose yield, purity, crystallinity index (CrI), thermal stability and process sustainability. Data were extracted by a single AI-assisted reviewer and synthesised narratively because outcome definitions differed. Alkaline treatment (47 studies), oxidative bleaching (31) and acid steps (22) dominated, and 28 studies (49%) used at least one non-conventional technology. Yield was reported in 22 studies, purity in 20 and CrI in 36. Isolation raised CrI in all 13 studies that reported paired values (median +14.0 percentage points). Reported purity ranged from 43.3% to 96.7% (median 81.9%), the highest values following enzyme-assisted pretreatment, microwave-assisted formic acid extraction and microwave subcritical water extraction. Only four studies quantified energy or environmental performance. No route was superior across outcomes, so choice should follow the target product, and standardised yield bases, CrI methods and sustainability metrics are needed. The evidence set was not retrieved by a complete database search, so the findings are a structured synthesis of a defined set of studies.

References

Aggarwal, N., Pal, P., Sharma, N., & Saravanamurugan, S. (2021). Consecutive organosolv and alkaline pretreatment: An efficient approach toward the production of cellulose from rice straw. ACS Omega, 6(41), 27247–27258. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04030

Almafie, M. R., Royani, I., & Sriyanti, I. (2026). Synthesis of microcrystalline cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunches through sequential chemical processing. Results in Engineering, 29, Article 109091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109091

Amensisa, Y. E., Demsash, H. D., & Tefera, M. E. (2024). Extraction and characterization of cellulose from coffee husk and brewery's spent grain fibers using alkali-hydrogen peroxide treatment method. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2024, Article 5101871. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5101871

Amior, A., Satha, H., Laoutid, F., Toncheva, A., & Dubois, P. (2023). Natural cellulose from Ziziphus jujuba fibers: Extraction and characterization. Materials, 16(1), Article 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010385

Benali, M., Oulmekki, A., & Toyir, J. (2024). The impact of the alkali-bleaching treatment on the isolation of natural cellulosic fibers from Juncus effesus L plant. Fibers and Polymers, 25(2), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00441-z

Casanova, F., Freixo, R., Pereira, C. F., Ribeiro, A. B., Costa, E. M., Pintado, M. E., & Ramos, Ó. L. (2023). Comparative study of green and traditional routes for cellulose extraction from a sugarcane by-product. Polymers, 15(5), Article 1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051251

Fouad, H., Kian, L. K., Jawaid, M., Alotaibi, M. D., Alothman, O. Y., & Hashem, M. (2020). Characterization of microcrystalline cellulose isolated from Conocarpus fiber. Polymers, 12(12), Article 2926. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122926

Ganapathy, T., Sathiskumar, R., Senthamaraikannan, P., Saravanakumar, S. S., & Khan, A. (2019). Characterization of raw and alkali treated new natural cellulosic fibres extracted from the aerial roots of banyan tree. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 138, 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.136

Garnett, M. T., Senthil Kumar, H. K., Beckingham, B. S., & Alexander, S. L. M. (2024). Extraction of cellulose from restaurant food waste. RSC Sustainability, 2(1), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3su00192j

He, C., Li, H., Hong, J., Xiong, H., Ni, H., & Zheng, M. (2022). Characterization and functionality of cellulose from pomelo fruitlets by different extraction methods. Polymers, 14(3), Article 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030518

Hozman-Manrique, A. S., Garcia-Brand, A. J., Hernández-Carrión, M., & Porras, A. (2023). Isolation and characterization of cellulose microfibers from Colombian cocoa pod husk via chemical treatment with pressure effects. Polymers, 15(3), Article 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030664

Jančíková, V., Jablonský, M., & Voleková, K. (2023). Delignification of wheat straw using DES-like mixtures. Sustainability, 15(21), Article 15343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115343

Ke, G., Tan, S., Wang, Y., Chen, S., & Liu, K. (2023). Extraction and characterization of cellulosic fibers from cattail leaves by aqueous sodium hydroxide/urea. Cellulose, 30(11), 6799–6810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05308-3

Lou, C., Zhou, Y., Yan, A., & Liu, Y. (2022). Extraction cellulose from corn-stalk taking advantage of pretreatment technology with immobilized enzyme. RSC Advances, 12(2), 1208–1215. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra07513f

Macarez, A. C., Maalej, H., Drobek, M., Pochat-Bohatier, C., Maalej, A., Chamkha, M., & Li, S. (2025). From olive stones waste to valuable resource: Exploring various techniques for cellulose extraction. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 13, Article 118204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.118204

Manzano Vela, D. R., Villegas Freire, C. N., Zabala Vizuete, R. F., & Flores Mancheno, A. C. (2024). Utilization of forest residues for cellulose extraction from timber species in the high montane forest of Chimborazo, Ecuador. Polymers, 16(19), Article 2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16192713

Melesse, G. T., Hone, F. G., & Mekonnen, M. A. (2022). Extraction of cellulose from sugarcane bagasse optimization and characterization. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, Article 1712207. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1712207

Mohan, P., Mohd Yusof, N. S., Thomas, S., & Abd Rahman, N. M. (2024). Ultrasound-alkali-assisted isolation of cellulose from coconut shells. BioResources, 19(4), 7870–7885. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.4.7870-7885

Moramarco, A., Ricca, E., Acciardo, E., Laurenti, E., & Bracco, P. (2025). Cellulose extraction from soybean hulls and hemp waste by alkaline and acidic treatments: An in-depth investigation on the effects of the chemical treatments on biomass. Polymers, 17(9), Article 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17091220

Nascimento, R. E. A., Carvalheira, M., Crespo, J. G., & Neves, L. A. (2023). Extraction and characterization of cellulose obtained from banana plant pseudostem. Clean Technologies, 5(3), 1028–1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol5030052

Neubert, L., Sunthornvarabhas, J., Sakulsombat, M., & Sriroth, K. (2020). Delignification and fractionation of sugarcane bagasse with ionic liquids. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology, 54(3–4), 301–318.

Pirozzi, A., Ferrari, G., & Donsì, F. (2022). Cellulose isolation from tomato pomace pretreated by high-pressure homogenization. Foods, 11(3), Article 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030266

Prasetyaningsih, Y., Kusumastuti, Y., Ariyanto, T., & Hidayat, M. (2025). Optimization of cellulose yield from oil palm trunks with deep eutectic solvents using response surface methodology. Green Processing and Synthesis, 14, Article 20240252. https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2024-0252

Pujokaroni, A. S., Ohtani, Y., & Ichiura, H. (2020). Ozone treatment for improving the solubility of cellulose extracted from palm fiber. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Article e49610. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.49610

Putranto, A. W., Chua, A. S. M., Suhartini, S., & Ngoh, G. C. (2025a). Augmentation of cellulose extraction from oil palm empty fruit bunch via rapid and energy-saving deep eutectic solvent-pulsed electric field pretreatment. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 15(10), 15867–15883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-06321-7

Putranto, A. W., Dutta, S., Priananda, C. W., Illias, H. A., Syafiqoh, Q., Masruchin, N., Wibisono, Y., Suhartini, S., Chua, A. S. M., & Ngoh, G. C. (2025b). Enhancement of cellulose nanocrystal yield from oil palm empty fruit bunches: A comparative study of binary and ternary deep eutectic solvents with pulsed electric field pretreatment. Biomass and Bioenergy, 196, Article 107672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107672

Qasim, U., Ali, Z., Nazir, M. S., Ul Hassan, S., Rafiq, S., Jamil, F., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., Ali, M., Niazi, M. B. K., Ahmad, N. M., Ullah, S., Mukhtar, A., & Saqib, S. (2020). Isolation of cellulose from wheat straw using alkaline hydrogen peroxide and acidified sodium chlorite treatments: Comparison of yield and properties. Advances in Polymer Technology, 2020, Article 9765950. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9765950

Rahmi, H. Y., Widi, D. C., Pamungkas, M. S., Putri, N. R. E., Hidayat, M., & Kusumastuti, Y. (2026). Synthesis of microcrystalline cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunches with delignification pretreatment using deep eutectic solvent. Chemical Papers. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-026-05139-z

Rigoletto, M., Tummino, M. L., Natali, E., Angileri, C., Grillo, G., Tabasso, S., Bortolotto, V., Bianchi, C. L., Cravotto, G., & Laurenti, E. (2026). Microwave-assisted subcritical water extraction method for the optimized isolation of cellulose from residual soybean hulls. ChemSusChem, 19(17), Article e71012. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.71012

Senthamaraikannan, P., & Kathiresan, M. (2018). Characterization of raw and alkali treated new natural cellulosic fiber from Coccinia grandis L. Carbohydrate Polymers, 186, 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.072

Singh, J. K., & Rout, A. K. (2024). Characterization of raw and alkali-treated cellulosic fibers extracted from Borassus flabellifer L. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14(10), 11633–11646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03238-x

Tuan Rohadi, T. N., Ridzuan, M. J. M., Abdul Majid, M. S., Khasri, A., & Sulaiman, M. H. (2020). Isolation and characterisation of cellulose from cortex, pith and whole of the Pennisetum purpureum: Effect of sodium hydroxide concentration. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 9(6), 15057–15071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.102

Van, N. T. T., Gaspillo, P., Thanh, H. G. T., Nhi, N. H. T., Long, H. N., Tri, N., Van, N. T. T., Nguyen, T. T., & Ha, H. K. P. (2022). Cellulose from the banana stem: Optimization of extraction by response surface methodology (RSM) and charaterization. Heliyon, 8, Article e11845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11845

Wang, Q., Xiao, S., Shi, S. Q., & Cai, L. (2019). Microwave-assisted formic acid extraction for high-purity cellulose production. Cellulose, 26(10), 5913–5924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02516-8

Yu, B., Fan, G., Zhao, S., Lu, Y., He, Q., Cheng, Q., Yan, J., Chai, B., & Song, G. (2021). Simultaneous isolation of cellulose and lignin from wheat straw and catalytic conversion to valuable chemical products. Applied Biological Chemistry, 64, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-020-00579-x

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

COMPARING CELLULOSE ISOLATION ROUTES FROM LIGNOCELLULOSIC AND AGRO-FOOD BIOMASS: A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF YIELD, PURITY AND CRYSTALLINITY . (2026). Mulawarman Agricultural Proceedings, 1(1), 39-47. https://e-journals2.unmul.ac.id/index.php/mulagriproc/article/view/5915