Systematic Risk, Earnings Persistence, and Earnings Response Coefficient: Moderator and Mediator Analysis (Evidence from Emerging Market Indonesia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/jfor.v27i1/4676Keywords:
Systematic Risk, Earnings Persistence, Investment Opportunity Set, Audit Quality, Earnings Response CoefficientAbstract
The results showed that systematic risk negatively and significantly affected the earnings response coefficient. Earnings persistence and investment opportunity set positively and significantly affected the earnings response coefficient. Both systematic risk and earnings persistence positively and significantly affected the investment opportunity set. The investment opportunity set did not mediate the relationship between systematic risk, earnings persistence, and the earnings response coefficient. However, audit quality moderated the effect of systematic risk and earnings persistence on the earnings response coefficient
References
Abidin D, Rizal I, Sundari S, Pakpahan M. Pendekatan Holistik Dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Meningkatkan Kepuasan Kerja. Jurnal Cakrawala Akademika. 2024;1(3):924–39.
Al-Ajlouni MI. Can high-performance work systems (HPWS) promote organisational innovation? Employee perspective-taking, engagement and creativity in a moderated mediation model. Employee Relations: The International Journal. 2021;43(2):373–97.
Badru AF, Karadas G, Olugbade OA, Hassanie S. Heliyon Can employees’ trust their supervisor? The role of high-performance work systems and stewardship climate on employee voice. Heliyon. 2024;10(19):e37795.
Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel A. Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2023;10(1):25–53.
Bakker AB, Oerlemans WGM. Daily job crafting and momentary work engagement: A self-determination and self-regulation perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2019;112:417–30.
Bakker AB, Van Wingerden J. Do personal resources and strengths use increase work engagement? The effects of a training intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2021;26(1):20.
Bock L. Work rules!: Insights from inside Google that will transform how you live and lead. Twelve; 2015.
Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications Ltd; 2023.
Dorta-Afonso D, González-de-la-Rosa M, Garcia-Rodriguez FJ, Romero-Domínguez L. Effects of high-performance work systems (HPWS) on hospitality employees’ outcomes through their organizational commitment, motivation, and job satisfaction. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3226.
Edgar F, Blaker NM, Everett AM. Gender and job performance: linking the high performance work system with the ability–motivation–opportunity framework. Personnel Review. 2021;50(1):47–63.
Fanda NM, Slamet MR. Pengaruh gaji, jam kerja fleksibel dan stres kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan pada perusahaan di Kota Batam. Journal of Applied Managerial Accounting. 2019;3(1):81–95.
Fu N, Flood PC, Bosak J, Morris T, O’Regan P. How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms? Employee Relations. 2015;37(2):209–31.
Gallup I. State of the global workplace: 2022 report. Gallup; 2023.
Ghozali I. Structural Equation Modeling dengan Metode Alternatif Partial Least Squares (PLS). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; 2021.
Gusharyani N, Rahmat A, Seswandi A. Dampak High Performance Work Systems (HPWS) terhadap Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCB) melalui Work Engagement. Jurnal Komunitas Sains Manajemen. 2023;2(1):38–50.
Hair J, Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications; 2021.
Harras H, Sutoro M. Analisis Deskriptif Kepuasan Kerja Dosen Berdasarkan Gaya Kepemimpinan Ketua Program Studi. PRODUKTIF: Jurnal Kepegawaian dan Organisasi. 2025;4(1):72–82.
Hayes AF. Statistical methods for communication science. Routledge; 2020.
Huselid MA. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38(3):635–72.
Ikaningtyas M, Zhahran BDA, Yuanesya ZL, Carolina A. Pemberdayaan karyawan melalui pelatihan dan pengembangan: Pengaruhnya terhadap pertumbuhan bisnis. Economics and Business Management Journal (EBMJ). 2024;3(01):77–85.
Jiang K, Messersmith J. On the shoulders of giants: A meta-review of strategic human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2018;29(1):6–33.
Judge TA, Erez A, Bono JE, Locke EA. Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005;90(2):257–68.
Judge TA, Klinger R, Li M. Promote job satisfaction through mental challenge. Principles of Organizational Behavior. 2023;161–78.
Khan MN, Malik MF. “My leader’s group is my group”. Leader-member exchange and employees’ behaviours. European Business Review. 2017;29(5):551–71.
Locke EA. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 1976.
Muslimah J, Samsir S. Mengintegrasikan servant leadership dan psychological detachment: Strategi holistik dalam meningkatkan kinerja dan kesejahteraan karyawan. Jurnal Bisnis Mahasiswa. 2025;5(5):2739–54.
Nababan GR, Agustina TS, Ekowati D. Exploring the relationship between high performance work systems (HPWS) and organizational innovation. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA). 2025;9(1):3251–76.
Nardi PM. Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Routledge; 2018.
Natasha A, Tanuwijaya J, Gunawan AW. The influence of high performance work systems (HPWS) and psychological well-being in increasing organizational commitment mediated by job satisfaction in the construction industry. Tekmapro. 2024;19(2).
Para-González L, Jiménez-Jiménez D, Martínez-Lorente ÁR. Do SHRM and HPWS shape employees’ affective commitment and empowerment? Evidence-based HRM. 2019;300–24.
Park J, Ok C, Ryu S. The two faces of HPWS in employee perceptions and organizational performance. Asia Pacific Management Review. 2023;28(4):519–30.
Petcu MA, Sobolevschi-David MI, Anica-Popa A, Curea SC, Motofei C, Popescu AM. Multidimensional assessment of job satisfaction in telework conditions. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):8965.
Pujiharti ES, Isnaini U. Instrumen dan Pengumpulan Data dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Data pada Penelitian Pendidikan. An Nahdliyyah. 2025;4(1).
Rahmayanti NP, Karsudjono AJ, Hidayatullah I. Pelatihan SPSS uji validitas dan uji reliabilitas untuk data primer. Bakti Banua. 2024;5(2):21–6.
Renhoran MI, Roswah HF, Sundari S, Pakpahan M. Strategi Peningkatan Keterlibatan Karyawan Melalui Pengelolaan Kinerja Dalam Organisasi Modern. Jurnal Cakrawala Akademika. 2024;1(3):940–56.
Shaleh AR, Hayat B, Samudera A. UWES-17 in the Indonesian context: Rasch analysis. JP3I. 2025;14(1):96–115.
Shih H, Chiang Y, Hsu C. Can high performance work systems really lead to better performance? International Journal of Manpower. 2006;27(8):741–63.
Sulung U, Muspawi M. Memahami sumber data penelitian: Primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Edu Research. 2024;5(3):110–6.
Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education. 2018;48(6):1273–96.
Zhou Q, Edafioghor TE, Wu C, Doherty B. Building organisational resilience capability in SMEs: The role of HPWS. Human Resource Management Journal. 2023;33(4):806–27.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Verdanica Desta Purwa, Zaki Fakhroni, Yunita Fitria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
