Section Policies

Section Policies
Journal of Agroecotechnology Innovation (JIA)

  1. Peer Review Policy
    All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Agroecotechnology Innovation undergo a peer review process to ensure scientific quality and academic contribution. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two reviewers who have expertise relevant to the manuscript topic. The journal applies a double blind peer review system. The identities of authors and reviewers remain anonymous during the review process. Editorial decisions regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection are based on the reviewers’ recommendations.

  2. Originality and Plagiarism Policy
    The Journal of Agroecotechnology Innovation only accepts original manuscripts that have not been previously published in other journals. All submitted manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection software. Manuscripts with a high level of similarity will be returned to the authors for revision or rejected by the editor.

  3. Open Access Policy
    The Journal of Agroecotechnology Innovation applies an open access policy. All published articles are freely accessible to readers without subscription fees. This policy aims to promote the dissemination of knowledge and increase access to research findings in the field of agriculture.

  4. Publication Ethics Policy
    Authors, editors, and reviewers must follow the principles of publication ethics. Authors are responsible for the originality of the data, the accuracy of the analysis, and the integrity of the reported research. Editors ensure fairness and objectivity in the editorial process. Reviewers provide independent and constructive evaluations while maintaining the confidentiality of the reviewed manuscripts.

  5. Submission Policy
    Authors must submit manuscripts through the journal’s online submission system and follow the manuscript preparation guidelines established by the Journal of Agroecotechnology Innovation.

  6. Revision and Editorial Decision Policy
    Manuscripts that require revision must be improved by the authors according to the comments provided by reviewers and editors. The editor has full authority to make the final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript.